Skip to main content
research

Gaming and Cognitive Performance: What a Large Study of 2,217 Children Found

A 2022 JAMA study found that children who played video games showed better response inhibition and working memory on cognitive tests, with associated brain activity differences

Klaus Decaux
September 7, 2025

What the Research Found

A study published in JAMA Network Open examined cognitive performance in children who played video games versus those who did not. The research, conducted by Dr. Bader Chaarani and colleagues at the University of Vermont, analyzed data from 2,217 children and found that gamers scored higher on several cognitive tasks.

This was a cross-sectional study (not a randomised controlled trial), which means it shows associations rather than proving that gaming caused the differences. The researchers were careful about this distinction.

Study Overview

This case-control study drew on neuroimaging and behavioral data to compare children who regularly played games with those who did not.

Key Participants

  • Total Sample: 2,217 children
  • Video Gamers: Children who played 3+ hours daily
  • Non-Gamers: Children with no regular gaming
  • Age Range: 9-10 years old
  • Data Source: Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study

Major Findings

1. Response Inhibition Scores

Video game players scored better on tasks measuring the ability to suppress inappropriate responses. This executive function matters for:

  • Decision-making under pressure
  • Avoiding impulsive choices
  • Academic focus

The gaming group showed better performance on stop-signal tasks in this sample, though effect sizes and causal direction remain areas of ongoing research.

2. Working Memory Task Performance

Gamers outperformed non-gamers on working memory tasks. Working memory is relevant to:

  • Problem-solving
  • Learning new information
  • Holding multiple things in mind at once

3. Attentional Distraction Measures

Video game players showed less susceptibility to attentional distraction in testing conditions. They appeared to:

  • Maintain focus despite irrelevant stimuli
  • Switch attention more efficiently
  • Filter out unnecessary information more effectively

Neural Observations

The study included neuroimaging data. Researchers observed differences between groups in brain activity and structure:

Cortical Activity Patterns

Imaging data showed:

  • Differences in gray matter density in regions associated with attention and memory
  • Differences in connectivity between frontal and parietal regions
  • Altered activation patterns in executive control networks

Brain Regions Showing Differences

Key areas where gamers and non-gamers differed:

  • Prefrontal Cortex: Linked to executive function
  • Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Linked to attention and conflict monitoring
  • Parietal Cortex: Linked to spatial processing and attention

These are associations observed in this cross-sectional snapshot. They do not establish what caused them.

What This Means (and What It Does Not Mean)

The study found that children who regularly played video games scored better on certain cognitive tasks and showed different brain activity patterns. That is a meaningful finding worth noting.

What the study does not establish:

  • That gaming directly caused the cognitive differences (selection effects are possible; cognitively curious children may be more drawn to games)
  • That any particular cognitive advantage translates to higher IQ or measured intelligence
  • That all game types produce the same effects

”But What About Gaming Addiction?”

The study carefully controlled for problematic gaming behaviors. The associations observed were in regular players, not those with gaming disorders.

”Screen Time is Harmful”

This research suggests the picture is more nuanced than blanket anti-screen-time advice. Interactive gaming and passive TV watching appear to have different cognitive profiles in this data.

Practical Takeaways

For Parents

  • Gaming can coexist with healthy cognitive development
  • Game content and engagement quality matter
  • Strategic games likely differ from purely reflexive ones
  • Balance with physical activity and social interaction remains sensible

For Educators

  • Gaming experience may be relevant context when thinking about student engagement
  • Game-based activities can tap genuine motivation
  • Cognitive skills practiced in games overlap with academic skills

For Gamers

  • The skills practiced in complex games (attention management, rapid decision-making, tracking multiple variables) are real cognitive exercises
  • Regular breaks help maintain performance and prevent fatigue
  • Different game genres exercise different abilities

Future Research Directions

This study opens questions that longitudinal research could address:

  1. Causal direction: Do gaming habits drive cognitive differences, or do children with higher baseline performance gravitate toward games?
  2. Genre specificity: Do different game types train different skills?
  3. Long-term tracking: How do these differences look across years of development?
  4. Individual variation: Who benefits most, and in what contexts?

What Saiki Draws From This

Research like the Chaarani et al. study supports a key premise: the skills practiced in complex games like League of Legends, including sustained attention, rapid response selection, and working memory, are measurable and meaningful cognitive abilities. Saiki analyzes your gameplay patterns to provide personality and behavioral insights grounded in what you actually do in-game, not self-report.

The JAMA data is consistent with the idea that gaming behavior carries real cognitive signal. It does not prove that your rank predicts your IQ or that Saiki is a clinical assessment instrument.

Conclusion

The JAMA study found real, measurable associations between regular gaming and better performance on several cognitive tasks in a sample of 2,217 children. The neuroimaging data adds biological depth to those behavioral findings. The design limitations mean we should talk about associations, not proven cognitive enhancement from gaming.

For Saiki users, what this research supports is simpler and more defensible: the hours spent in League of Legends involve genuine cognitive effort, and patterns in that gameplay carry meaningful information about how you process, decide, and adapt.

Take Action

Curious what your gameplay patterns say about you? Saiki analyzes your League of Legends data to provide insights into your:

  • Attentional patterns
  • Decision-making style
  • Processing tendencies
  • Personality profile based on how you actually play

Start your personality assessment today and discover what your gaming behavior reveals.

Key Findings

  • Video gamers showed stronger cognitive task scores across multiple domains
  • Improved response inhibition and working memory in children who gamed
  • Gamers showed less susceptibility to attentional distraction on tasks
  • Researchers observed differences in cortical activity patterns
Klaus Decaux

Klaus Decaux

Klaus is a software developer from Liège, Belgium, with over a decade of experience in web development and digital content creation.

References

  1. [1] Chaarani B, Ortigara J, Yuan D, et al. Association of Video Gaming With Cognitive Performance Among Children. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2235721

Apply This Research to Your Gaming

Discover what your League of Legends gameplay reveals about your personality and intelligence